Which argument most supports the constitutionality of a Forest Service regulation imposing penalties for negligent or prohibited campfire use?

Which argument most supports the constitutionality of a Forest Service regulation imposing penalties for negligent or prohibited campfire use?

• A. The rule is constitutional because Congress allowed agencies to issue regulations with no guiding principle
• B. The rule is constitutional due to executive branch oversight
• C. The rule is constitutional because agencies operate with expertise
• D. The rule is constitutional because Congress provided an intelligible principle guiding the exercise of authority

Answer: (D)